The knowledge of Enneagram is a study of personality. Nowadays, many people know about it, but there are really very few correct judgments about their model. Most people look at the model. , It’s easy to mistakenly think that you are the number four simply because you just have a few points that fit the type four personality. In fact, there are very few people of the real type four, just like AB blood is the least of all blood types. Most of them just mistakenly think that they are number four, just because they are also sentimental, emotional, easily sentimental, have personality, like art and so on. This kind of judgment is very wrong. To judge what type of person a person is, you don't think that you just have certain characteristics of this model, and you think you are like this.
When it comes to the division of Enneagram, it can be divided into heart, brain, and abdominal areas. Among them, the heart area pays attention to image and is very emotional. People in the area pay attention to analysis and be rational in doing things. People in the abdominal area pay attention to intuition and live in their own instincts. Among them, the second, third, and fourth are all in the heart area. At the same time, they pay much attention to their own image. Many people of No.2 and No.3 types are emotional, emotional, and romantic, soI mistakenly thought I was number four. So, how do you see whether it is No. 4 or not? The main characteristics of No. 4 are that they are very ego, temperamental, idealistic, love-hate and hateful, like a dramatic life, sentimental, and easy to immerse themselves in their own time and sadness. Therefore, if you divide it according to this standard, except for No. 5 and No. 1, other models are very likely to be divided into No. 4.
I used to mistakenly think that I was number four, just because the description of number four in the book fits me (very personality, pursuit of uniqueness, self-awareness) Strong, sentimental, sensitive and delicate, rich in my inner world, love to cry and laugh.) In this way, I always mistakenly think that I am number four, and therefore I have determined my life direction, and I want to develop in psychology and literature. The route is the most suitable. However, one day when I was in college, I met a master who studies Enneagram on the Internet. I wrote my personality and life experience on the forum to communicate with them. Most of them are what kind of people, what they like, what kind of bitterness, etc. The more you talk with them, the more you find that you are really not number four, because the way you do things is not based on feelings. It’s a rational analysis. If it’s number four, it’s OK.The way is to focus on the heart, rather than excessively rational brain.
Although I have been an emotional person since I was a child, I am a person who is not very good at controlling emotions, but it is very rational to really do things. Even if you are in love, you can talk very rationally. If it is number four, how can you be so rational in your style of doing things? How can you be so rational even in love. Just because I was afraid of accidents, what would happen to this relationship, what would happen badly, and hurt myself, I didn't dare to completely let go of love, love carefully. This kind of behavior is more like No. 5 and No. 6 than No. 4.
But, Since I was a child, I am a person who dares to love and hate, is very self, has personality and is sensitive, lives very casual, yearns for unlimited freedom, is afraid of being bound, likes mysterious things, and is easy to live in the past. From these characteristics, it is indeed It fits the style of No. 4. However, despite the fact that so many places seem to be No. 4, why did I find that my true heart is not the truth of No. 4? Is it just too rational and so simple? Of course not. It also depends on my style of writing. Not quite like No. 4 (lack of aura, very straightforward style), my mind is too calm and I rarely act impulsively. I especially like to ask others why, to get to the bottom of things, fromI like to study the laws of objective existence and have strong insights. The ability to write reviews is far stronger than that of prose. They are more often immersed in the world of thinking than in the world of idealism. These characteristics are in line with No. 5 and The characteristics of No. 6 are so consistent that the possibility of No. 4 can be completely eliminated. This kind of analysis makes me think that what is the number of Enneagrams depends on the angle you use to divide them. Like many things, different classification methods will have different results, but they are essential. Is unchanged again.
Because I found that I had misjudged my model type, I also wanted to understand a truth, in fact , Things like models are just like colors. For example, red can also be divided into red, pink, and rose red, but they can all be collectively called red. Personality models are also divided in this way. I personally think the best way to divide it is not to look at What are the characteristics of those models? It depends on what your fears are, how you do things, and how you will react when you encounter something. This is more accurate. If you only look at the characteristics of the model easy to feel like I have met, so it seems, can not do this to judge models
(original starting this article, the authors: words such as lucky, Introduction: alternative literary women, like theoretical analysis, good emotion analysis, I like to study human nature and the law of development of things, and it is easy to be immersed in my own world and forget everything. )