Does one enemy and one hundred exist on the ancient battlefield? If it exists, under what circumstances is it most likely to happen

2020-08-12 07:52:20 0 Comment 716 views
abstract

In ancient literary works, when describing a warrior who is brave, he is often described as "unworthy of bravery." Of course, we know that the "wanfu"

In ancient literary works, when describing a warrior who is brave, he is often described as "unworthy of bravery." Of course, we know that the "wanfu" here is a kind of imaginary finger. After all, a person's physical strength is limited.

In some relatively realistic war films depicting the Cold Weapon Era, the battle scenes of winning more with less are always very thrilling and exciting, and the proportion of the number of warring parties is not particularly exaggerated. If one party can beat dozens of enemies, it will inevitably be suspected of a drama. So in a real cold weapon war, is it really possible for one person to kill hundreds of people in an exaggerated record?

Does one enemy and one hundred exist on the ancient battlefield? If it exists, under what circumstances is it most likely to happen

The answer is yesof.

The physical differences between the ancients are great

In the era of cold weapons, human agricultural productivity was still very low. Most of the low-level civilians are always struggling with food and clothing. If any emperor can avoid famine and rarely starve to death, it is a great prosperity.

In the era when hunger was very common, ordinary people who lacked food generally practiced two meals a day, and they ate less dinner, because they often had to go to bed after meals.

Does one enemy and one hundred exist on the ancient battlefield? If it exists, under what circumstances is it most likely to happen

In this malnourished situation, the ancient Most ordinary soldiers are actually thin and small.

And those fierce generals who can fight one hundred against one hundred?

They baseThey were all born in wealthy families, not to mention eating three meals a day, and they often get meat. At the same time, because they don't need to farm, they can spend all their time honing their combat skills, and they can build themselves into an ancient super warrior through training and diet. This is what the so-called poor civil servants say.

Does one enemy and one hundred exist on the ancient battlefield? If it exists, under what circumstances is it most likely to happen

So we always see portraits of ancient generals With a big general belly, only that figure has the strongest combat effectiveness!

There is a big difference in weaponry and equipment.

The warlords on the ancient battlefield always dressed neatly, riding their horses to charge and kill the enemy.

Strong and thick armor can provide almost insoluble defense. In combat, very few people wear good armorNeed to consider avoiding the opponent's attack, which allows him to focus all his energy on killing the enemy. Of course, he needs to be careful not to fall off the horse at all times, because the heavy armor on his body is likely to make it difficult for him to move, even unable to get up and become a living target for slaughter.

A good horse can provide powerful impact and mobility. When the heavy cavalry initiates an impact, there is no need for any fancy moves, only the lance is raised horizontally. The powerful impact provided by the horse can easily impact the infantry team.

At the same time, the cavalry comes and goes like the wind, fights when you want to fight, and retreats when you want to retreat, which can fully occupy the initiative on the battlefield, which makes the combat effectiveness of the cavalry more exaggerated.

In comparison, ordinary infantry not only has simple weapons, but also probably only wears cloth or leather armor, which leads to further expansion of the combat effectiveness of both sides.

Does one enemy and one hundred exist on the ancient battlefield? If it exists, under what circumstances is it most likely to happen

Imagine Tyson rushing towards you on a tall horse. You can’t beat it. , Can't run, how desperate is that mood?

It usually occurs when chasing and killing rout soldiers.

In cold weapon combat, the easiest time to kill the enemy is not a confrontation between the two armies, but after the collapse of one’s military spirit and the start of rout .

It is basically difficult for an army to maintain a formation when it is fleeing, and only the back is exposed to chasing soldiers, which is the time when an army has the lowest combat effectiveness. Although Chu Yunfei complained: "Even if it is more than 50,000 pigs, it is not that easy to catch it." But for a warrior riding a war horse, it is not difficult to kill hundreds of enemy troops while chasing the rout. Did it.

Does one enemy and one hundred exist on the ancient battlefield? If it exists, under what circumstances is it most likely to happen

In that case, only the warhorse and him can limit the maximum kill Physical strength.

It’s difficult to kill more than a hundred enemies in a foot battle.

If it’s a foot battle, it’s almost impossible for one person to kill a hundred people. After all, even if the enemy is standing there It is also a very physical consuming thing to chop you without moving.

At the same time, in terms of the quality of ancient weapons, multiple hacks and killings are not supported unless the weapons are constantly changed during combat. For example, in the episode of "Water Margin" blood splattered at Yuanyang Tower, after Wu Song killed many people in a row, he cut a gap in his hand with a Pu knife, resulting in "no head cut". Another example is the infamous beheading of a hundred people during the Anti-Japanese War. Japanese officer Jing MinMinghe Noda also cut a gap with the blade in his hand.

Does one enemy and one hundred exist on the ancient battlefield? If it exists, under what circumstances is it most likely to happen

So if you want to kill more than a hundred enemies in a step battle, just Like Dian Wei, fighting spirit and strength are indispensable, very rare.

Using bows and arrows is also difficult to kill more than a hundred enemies

The bows and arrows used in combat are mostly heavy and powerful bows, and it is very difficult for ordinary people to draw them all at once. Moreover, on the battlefield, it is almost impossible to have arrows without any illusions. Arrows are deadly. Therefore, if you want to kill hundreds of enemies with a bow and arrow, you need to pull the bow at least hundreds of times. This is an impossible task.

Does one enemy and one hundred exist on the ancient battlefield? If it exists, under what circumstances is it most likely to happen

To sum up, in the Cold Weapon War, if you want to achieve the achievement of killing hundreds of people with one person’s power, then this person should learn from his childhood. Wu, a cavalry with different physical qualities from ordinary people, and at the same time the battle situation has evolved into a one-sided pursuit. After these conditions are met, you can still look forward to a brilliant victory with one enemy and one hundred.

avatar