The America’s Cup is over. Host Brazil won the ninth America’s Cup in team history after 12 years, second only to Uruguay’s 15 times and Argentina’s 14 times. After the game won all the awards, there was a bonus of 1,350 dollars in the account, which can be described as a lot of money. In the best team, Brazil also had 5 people selected, but Messi, the biggest star of the America's Cup, missed the best team.
Although Messi only scored 1 penalty and 1 assist in 6 games,There is a red card, but almost every game has the highest score in the team, and teammate Paredes was selected, why Messi did not. At this time, conspiracy theories emerged, thinking it was related to Messi’s bombardment of the referee organizing committee and the South American Football Association.
In recent days, the referee Roddy Zambrano, who was not interviewed after the game (Brazil and Argentina in this final), finally showed up to speak and explained the two major advantages of that game. Controversial place.
First of all, for the scene where Aguero fell in the penalty area, Roddy Zambrano pointed out: This is obviously Aguero stepped on Alves, which is almost for the defensive player foul. Aguero said before that he was tripped by Alves. The two people's statements are very different, but they are also well understood. After all, the positions of the stations are different. Aguero must be on Argentina's side, and the referee must maintain his professionalism and insist on his own punishment. From slow motionJudging from it, it is 50-50, so it is best not to make a penalty.
The second one is Otamendi in the restricted area Zambrano said: "VAR reviewed Artur’s collision with Otamendi. It was a 50-50 contact, so it was not a penalty.
From the slow motion review, most fans think that Artur is obviously hitting people, and it is definitely not a 50-50 situation, so this penalty is still controversial. Then again, Messi's red card is also because of It was caused by pushing the other person a bit, how can this be explained?
In response to Messi’s criticism of himself, Zambrano said: “Messi has been involved in the game, and I have never had anything with him. Question, his speech after the game surprised me, but everyone can have their own opinions. "I can hear that the referee still gave Messi a lot of face. He didn't say bad things about Messi, but only expressed surprise, and he was free of speech. You can say anything you want.
But others are not as easy to talk as this referee, especially the Brazilian team, they have expressed dissatisfaction. Believe that Messi’s remarks hurt us, that it’s disrespect for Brazil. And the Peruvian coachIt is also believed that the accusation is best to show evidence. There is nothing wrong with their refutation, but what is surprising is that even if the official personnel of the Argentine Football Association do not support Messi, the third vice president of the Argentine Football Association Guillermo-Rade pointed out: If Messi has no evidence, he should apologize. .
Guillermo Rad said: "It’s not that all Messi’s statements are politically correct. If what you say is not based on facts, then you should stand up and apologize. I can Understand, people sometimes say such things when their heads are hot."
This makes Messi quite cold, and it is really sad that even his own person does not support himself. Up. However, Messi replied with virtue. The tea restaurant opened in his hometown distributed food and drinks to the homeless and the poor in the city for free to help them through the winter. It is estimated that thisKind deeds can help about two thousand people to improve their current difficult situation.
But there is also a strong support for Messi, the Argentine star Ken Pace stood up and supported the captain of his national team. He did not shy away from directing the spearhead to the American Football Association. He said: "Your Excellencies in the Football Association, you invest all your money in places that have nothing to do with football, bribery and corruption, and collaborating. Now they want to punish those who really The defender of football. So, when you are stating a great fact, where are democracy and freedom of speech?"
Kempes is quite angry, which also makes Messi feel a little bit angry. Warmth. But still the same sentence, please show evidence, it is better to say that any speech is freeWhat substantial help.